What is genotypic ratio and phenotypic ratio




















However, a genotypic ratio can indicate a phenotypic ratio. This law explains the reason that the progeny is not the exact copy of their parents.

The genotypic ratio is the ratio depicting the different genotypes of the offspring from a test cross. It represents the pattern of offspring distribution according to genotype , which is the genetic constitution determining the phenotype of an organism.

It describes the number of times a genotype would appear in the offspring after a test cross. For example, a test cross between two organisms with the same genotype, Rr , for a heterozygous dominant trait will result in offspring with genotypes: RR , Rr , and rr. In this example, the predicted genotypic ratio is Compare: phenotypic ratio. See examples of test cross and genotypes here: What is the key to the recognition of codominance?

J oin our Forum to discover more! Consider breeding between two homozygous plants, a RR red flower and rr white flower. Suppose the Rr phenotype is pink, now, consider self-pollination has happened in plants with pink flowers Rr , so what would be the progeny in such a case?

Again, according to the law of segregation:. For writing the genotypic ratio, let us identify the number of red, white, and pink flowers in the progeny. As we can see from the above cross, there is one red flower, one white flower, and two pink flowers. So the predicted genotype of the progeny would be From the above example, we can define the genotypic ratio as the number of times a particular genotype appears after crossing over. In genetics, Punnett square is the most popular method of representing a breeding crossover to predict the genotype of the progeny.

It is a square diagram named after its creator Reginald C. Punnett square summarizes the maternal and paternal alleles along with all the probable genotypes of the progeny in a tabular form.

Punnett square is also used as a genotypic ratio calculator. There are four, and all must be ww. Each child got a little w from Dad and the other little w from Mom. So, both parents must be heterozygous Ww. Note that just like the monohybrid crosses, how important the recessive offspring are in these types of problems. You automatically know that each parent had that hidden recessive allele based solely on the phenotype of the offspring. You have an individual who is totally heterozygous for 2 genes that are not linked i.

One gene is for ear size AA or Aa being big ears whereas aa is for small ears and the other gene is for buggy eyes BB and Bb for buggy eyes whereas bb represents normal eyes. If you testcross this individual, what are the resulting genotypes and phenotypes? Answer: Remember that a testcross represents a cross with a totally recessive individual.

These types of crosses are useful in weeding out hidden recessive alleles from your unknown. Remember the information on recessives if you don't remember anything else.

By knowing the recessive, you automatically know both the phenotype and genotype. In the monohybrid cross, a testcross of a heterozygous individual resulted in a ratio. With the dihybrid cross, you should expect a ratio!

Now then, after you've completed the problem above, lets ignore the Punnett's square and simply look at the 4 types of offspring from the above cross. What if the actual ratios in your testcross were not , but were as follows. What would this represent? Thus, they are NOT assorting independently as Mendel states in his second law.

If they were, you would get the ratios. The genotypes and phenotypes with the small percentages Aabb and aaBb represent outcomes that were produced due to "crossing over" during Meiosis I, some homologous chromosomes broke between the 2 genes and DNA was exchanged. Because the percentage of these oddball recombinants was low, then it is likely that the genes are fairly near one another. In this case, "A" and "B" are on the same chromosome whereas "a" and "b" occur on the other chromosome except for the ones that just crossed over.

The following is a genetic linkage problem involving 4 genes. You want to determine which of the genes are linked, and which occur on separate chromosomes. You cross two true breeding i. You then testcross the F1 generation, which you should realize by now are totally heterozygous individuals, and obtain the ratios below.

What's going on? Therefore, the flower color gene and seed texture are linked. Since all of the other crosses are , then all other genes are on chromosomes separate from the first 2. Therefore, 3 separate chromosomes are involved. The following is a genetic linkage problem also involving 4 genes. You want to determine which of the genes are linked, which occur on separate chromosomes, and the distances between the linked genes.

You cross 2 true breeding i. You then testcross the F1 generation, and obtain the ratios below. How many chromosomes are involved in the linkages, and what are the positions of the linked genes relative to one another? Therefore, they are linked. In a paternity dispute, a type AB woman claimed that one of four men was the father of her type A child the child would be type A with a genotype of either be AA or AO.

Which of the following men could be the father of the child on the basis of the evidence given? The Type A father? A man with either of these genotypes could be the father as the mother would donate the A allele to the child and either an A allele from the father or an O allele from the father would produce a child with Type A blood. The Type B father? A man with the genotype BO could be the father as the mother would donate the A allele to the child and an O allele from the father would produce a child with Type A blood.

The Type O father? Answer: In this case a type O person would have the genotype OO. A man with this genotype could be the father as the mother would donate the A allele to the child and an O allele from the father would produce a child with Type A blood.

The Type AB father? When true-breeding plants were cross-fertilized, in which one parent had yellow seeds and one had green seeds, all of the F 1 hybrid offspring had yellow seeds. That is, the hybrid offspring were phenotypically identical to the true-breeding parent with yellow seeds. However, we know that the allele donated by the parent with green seeds was not simply lost because it reappeared in some of the F 2 offspring Figure 8.

Therefore, the F 1 plants must have been genotypically different from the parent with yellow seeds. The P plants that Mendel used in his experiments were each homozygous for the trait he was studying. Diploid organisms that are homozygous for a gene have two identical alleles, one on each of their homologous chromosomes.

The genotype is often written as YY or yy , for which each letter represents one of the two alleles in the genotype. The dominant allele is capitalized and the recessive allele is lower case. When P plants with contrasting traits were cross-fertilized, all of the offspring were heterozygous for the contrasting trait, meaning their genotype had different alleles for the gene being examined. For example, the F 1 yellow plants that received a Y allele from their yellow parent and a y allele from their green parent had the genotype Yy.

Our discussion of homozygous and heterozygous organisms brings us to why the F 1 heterozygous offspring were identical to one of the parents, rather than expressing both alleles.

In all seven pea-plant characteristics, one of the two contrasting alleles was dominant, and the other was recessive. Mendel called the dominant allele the expressed unit factor; the recessive allele was referred to as the latent unit factor.

We now know that these so-called unit factors are actually genes on homologous chromosomes. For a gene that is expressed in a dominant and recessive pattern, homozygous dominant and heterozygous organisms will look identical that is, they will have different genotypes but the same phenotype , and the recessive allele will only be observed in homozygous recessive individuals. For example, when crossing true-breeding violet-flowered plants with true-breeding white-flowered plants, all of the offspring were violet-flowered, even though they all had one allele for violet and one allele for white.

Rather than both alleles contributing to a phenotype, the dominant allele will be expressed exclusively. The recessive allele will remain latent, but will be transmitted to offspring in the same manner as that by which the dominant allele is transmitted. The recessive trait will only be expressed by offspring that have two copies of this allele Figure 8. When fertilization occurs between two true-breeding parents that differ by only the characteristic being studied, the process is called a monohybrid cross, and the resulting offspring are called monohybrids.

Mendel performed seven types of monohybrid crosses, each involving contrasting traits for different characteristics. Out of these crosses, all of the F 1 offspring had the phenotype of one parent, and the F 2 offspring had a phenotypic ratio. On the basis of these results, Mendel postulated that each parent in the monohybrid cross contributed one of two paired unit factors to each offspring, and every possible combination of unit factors was equally likely.

The probability of an event is calculated by the number of times the event occurs divided by the total number of opportunities for the event to occur.

A probability of one percent for some event indicates that it is guaranteed to occur, whereas a probability of zero 0 percent indicates that it is guaranteed to not occur, and a probability of 0. To demonstrate this with a monohybrid cross, consider the case of true-breeding pea plants with yellow versus green seeds. The dominant seed color is yellow; therefore, the parental genotypes were YY for the plants with yellow seeds and yy for the plants with green seeds.

A Punnett square, devised by the British geneticist Reginald Punnett, is useful for determining probabilities because it is drawn to predict all possible outcomes of all possible random fertilization events and their expected frequencies. Figure 8. To prepare a Punnett square, all possible combinations of the parental alleles the genotypes of the gametes are listed along the top for one parent and side for the other parent of a grid. The combinations of egg and sperm gametes are then made in the boxes in the table on the basis of which alleles are combining.

Each box then represents the diploid genotype of a zygote, or fertilized egg. Because each possibility is equally likely, genotypic ratios can be determined from a Punnett square. If the pattern of inheritance dominant and recessive is known, the phenotypic ratios can be inferred as well. For a monohybrid cross of two true-breeding parents, each parent contributes one type of allele. In this case, only one genotype is possible in the F 1 offspring.

All offspring are Yy and have yellow seeds. When the F 1 offspring are crossed with each other, each has an equal probability of contributing either a Y or a y to the F 2 offspring. The result is a 1 in 4 25 percent probability of both parents contributing a Y , resulting in an offspring with a yellow phenotype; a 25 percent probability of parent A contributing a Y and parent B a y , resulting in offspring with a yellow phenotype; a 25 percent probability of parent A contributing a y and parent B a Y , also resulting in a yellow phenotype; and a 25 percent probability of both parents contributing a y , resulting in a green phenotype.

When counting all four possible outcomes, there is a 3 in 4 probability of offspring having the yellow phenotype and a 1 in 4 probability of offspring having the green phenotype. Using large numbers of crosses, Mendel was able to calculate probabilities, found that they fit the model of inheritance, and use these to predict the outcomes of other crosses.

Observing that true-breeding pea plants with contrasting traits gave rise to F 1 generations that all expressed the dominant trait and F 2 generations that expressed the dominant and recessive traits in a ratio, Mendel proposed the law of segregation. This law states that paired unit factors genes must segregate equally into gametes such that offspring have an equal likelihood of inheriting either factor. For the F 2 generation of a monohybrid cross, the following three possible combinations of genotypes result: homozygous dominant, heterozygous, or homozygous recessive.

The equal segregation of alleles is the reason we can apply the Punnett square to accurately predict the offspring of parents with known genotypes. Beyond predicting the offspring of a cross between known homozygous or heterozygous parents, Mendel also developed a way to determine whether an organism that expressed a dominant trait was a heterozygote or a homozygote. Called the test cross, this technique is still used by plant and animal breeders.

In a test cross, the dominant-expressing organism is crossed with an organism that is homozygous recessive for the same characteristic.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000